4.7 Article

Endoscopic and Endoscopically-Assisted Resection of Intraventricular Lesions Using a Neuroendoscopic Ultrasonic Aspirator

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173889

关键词

neuroendoscopy; ultrasonic aspirator; surgical technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The utilization of neuroendoscopic ultrasonic aspirator (NUA) for resection of intraventricular lesions appears to be a safe and valuable tool, achieving gross/near total resection with transient morbidity observed in some cases. The type, size, consistency, and vascularization of the lesion may limit the purely endoscopic use of the NUA in selected cases.
The development of minimally invasive neuroendoscopy has advanced in recent years. The introduction of the neuroendoscopic ultrasonic aspirator (NUA) broadened the treatment spectrum of neuroendoscopy. We aim to describe our experience with the use of NUA for the resection of intraventricular lesions. Here, we present consecutive retrospective case series of adult and pediatric patients undergoing resection of an intraventricular lesion with a NUA (Endoscopic Neurosurgical Pen, Soring GmbH, Quickborn, Germany) between January 2019 and April 2020. Eight patients between the age of 0.5 and 73 years underwent surgery using NUA and were included in this study. In four patients, an endoscopic assisted (EA) resection of the lesion was undertaken, while in four patients, the lesion was removed using purely endoscopic (PE) resection. In all cases, gross/near total resection was achieved. The average blood loss was 142.5 +/- 90.4 mL (range 50-300 mL). Transient morbidity was seen in four patients (50%), while permanent morbidity or mortality did not occur. The NUA seems to be a safe and valuable tool for the minimally invasive resection of intraventricular lesions in selected cases. The type, size, consistency, and vascularization of the lesion limit at times the purely endoscopic use of the NUA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据