4.7 Article

Hyponatremia in Children and Adults with Prader-Willi Syndrome: A Survey Involving Seven Countries

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163555

关键词

Prader-Willi syndrome; hyponatremia; excessive fluid intake; syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone; desmopressin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyponatremia in PWS is rare but potentially fatal, with causes including desmopressin treatment and excessive fluid intake. Monitoring sodium levels and avoiding desmopressin treatment should be included in routine follow-ups for patients with PWS.
In Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), conditions that are associated with hyponatremia are common, such as excessive fluid intake (EFI), desmopressin use and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) caused by psychotropic medication. However, the prevalence of hyponatremia in PWS has rarely been reported. Our aim was to describe the prevalence and severity of hyponatremia in PWS. In October 2020, we performed a retrospective study based on the medical records of a large cohort of children and adults with PWS from seven countries. Among 1326 patients (68% adults), 34 (2.6%) had at least one episode of mild or moderate hyponatremia (125 <= Na < 135 mmol/L). The causes of non-severe hyponatremia were often multi-factorial, including psychotropic medication in 32%, EFI in 24% and hyperglycemia in 12%. No obvious cause was found in 29%. Seven (0.5%) adults experienced severe hyponatremia (Na < 125 mmol/L). Among these, five recovered completely, but two died. The causes of severe hyponatremia were desmopressin treatment for nocturnal enuresis (n = 2), EFI (n = 2), adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), diuretic treatment (n = 1) and unknown (n = 1). In conclusion, severe hyponatremia was very rare but potentially fatal in PWS. Desmopressin treatment for nocturnal enuresis should be avoided. Enquiring about EFI and monitoring serum sodium should be included in the routine follow-ups of patients with PWS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据