4.7 Article

Diagnostic Value of the PeptestTM in Detecting Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132996

关键词

laryngopharyngeal reflux; gastroesophageal reflux disease; Peptest(TM); 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH; Reflux Finding Score

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, Conceptual Development of Research Organization [MH CZ-DRO-FNOs/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the diagnostic value of Peptest in detecting LPR based on MII-pH monitoring. The accuracy for diagnosing LPR using Peptest is relatively low, but higher for diagnosing GERD.
Background: The Peptest(TM) is a non-invasive diagnostic test for measuring the pepsin concentration in saliva, which is thought to correlate with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of the Peptest in detecting LPR based on 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring using several hypopharyngeal reflux episodes as criterion for LPR. Methods: Patients with suspected LPR were examined with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), fasting Peptest, and MII-pH monitoring. We calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Peptest, RSI, and RFS based on the threshold of one and six hypopharyngeal reflux episodes. Results: Altogether, the data from 46 patients were analyzed. When one hypopharyngeal reflux episode was used as a diagnostic threshold for LPR, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were, respectively, as follows: 35%, 33%, 100%, 100%, and 3%, for the Peptest; 39%, 40%, 0%, 95%, and 0%, for the RSI; and 57%, 58%, 0%, 96%, and 0%, for the RFS. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the Peptest for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were 46%, 27%, 63%, 40.0%, and 48%, respectively. Conclusions: A positive Peptest is highly supportive of a pathological LPR diagnosis. However, a negative test could not exclude LPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据