4.8 Article

Piezo1 channels restrain regulatory T cells but are dispensable for effector CD4+ T cell responses

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 28, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg5859

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 NS14609, R01 AI121945, R37 GM-48071, R21 AR072849, R01 NS109810, DP2 AT010376]
  2. James H. Gilliam Fellowship for Advanced Study from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) [GT11549]
  3. Hewitt Foundation for Biomedical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an animal model for multiple sclerosis, mice with genetic deletion of Piezo1 in T cells showed diminished disease severity. Piezo1 was not essential for lymph node homing, T cell proliferation, or differentiation into proinflammatory T helper cells, but its deletion resulted in enhanced TGF beta signaling and an expanded pool of regulatory T cells. Deletion of Piezo1 specifically in T-reg cells led to significant attenuation of EAE.
T lymphocytes encounter complex mechanical cues during an immune response. The mechanosensitive ion channel, Piezo1, drives inflammatory responses to bacterial infections, wound healing, and cancer; however, its role in helper T cell function remains unclear. In an animal model for multiple sclerosis, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), we found that mice with genetic deletion of Piezo1 in T cells showed diminished disease severity. Unexpectedly, Piezo1 was not essential for lymph node homing, interstitial motility, Ca2+ signaling, T cell proliferation, or differentiation into proinflammatory T helper 1 (T(H)1) and T(H)17 subsets. However, Piezo1 deletion in T cells resulted in enhanced transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta) signaling and an expanded pool of regulatory T (T-reg) cells. Moreover, mice with deletion of Piezo1 specifically in T-reg cells showed significant attenuation of EAE. Our results indicate that Piezo1 selectively restrains T-reg cells, without influencing activation events or effector T cell functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据