4.8 Article

High-throughput single-cell quantification of hundreds of proteins using conventional flow cytometry and machine learning

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 39, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg0505

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [5U19AI128914, R01AI127726]
  2. Metavivor
  3. The Roberta Robinson Fede Endowment
  4. Fred Hutch Immunotherapy and Translational Data Science Integrated Research Centers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of Infinity Flow, which combines hundreds of overlapping flow cytometry panels using machine learning, enables the simultaneous analysis of coexpression patterns of hundreds of surface-expressed proteins across millions of individual cells, allowing comprehensive analysis of cellular constituency and identification of previously unknown cellular heterogeneity. Through supervised machine learning, Infinity Flow enhances the accuracy and depth of clustering or dimensionality reduction algorithms, making it a highly scalable, low-cost solution for single-cell proteomics in complex tissues.
Modern immunologic research increasingly requires high-dimensional analyses to understand the complex milieu of cell types that comprise the tissue microenvironments of disease. To achieve this, we developed Infinity Flow combining hundreds of overlapping flow cytometry panels using machine learning to enable the simultaneous analysis of the coexpression patterns of hundreds of surface-expressed proteins across millions of individual cells. In this study, we demonstrate that this approach allows the comprehensive analysis of the cellular constituency of the steady-state murine lung and the identification of previously unknown cellular heterogeneity in the lungs of melanoma metastasis-bearing mice. We show that by using supervised machine learning, Infinity Flow enhances the accuracy and depth of clustering or dimensionality reduction algorithms. Infinity Flow is a highly scalable, low-cost, and accessible solution to single-cell proteomics in complex tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据