4.2 Article

Effect of TiO2 doping on the sintering behavior of Zr-based ceramic for use as TBC

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 1425-1434

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s41779-021-00645-7

关键词

Microstructure; Titanium oxide; Thermal barrier coating; Solid state sintering; Zirconia-magnesia-titania

资金

  1. Council to Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel -CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on zirconia-based ceramics incorporated with TiO2 for use as thermal barrier coating, with MgO added to stabilize zirconia in a metastable phase. The addition of TiO2 up to 7.5 wt.% showed improvement in properties, highlighting the potential for enhanced TBC materials.
In the present work, zirconia-based ceramics incorporated with TiO2 (titania) were produced and characterized as candidate material for use as thermal barrier coating (TBC). Zirconia was stabilized in the tetragonal metastable phase from the addition of 24 wt.% of MgO (magnesia). Alternative materials, such as these, have been studied worldwide in order to prospect candidates for TBC application with improved temperature behavior. Titania was added to the matrix of ZrO2.24MgO in the proportions of 0, 7.5, 15, and 22.5 wt.%. The compacted samples were sintered for 24 h in thermal cycles at 1250 degrees C. Powder characteristics were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and light scattering technique. The phase identification of raw materials and the sintered ceramics was investigated by powder X-ray diffractometry. The microstructural characterization of the sintered ceramics was performed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, physical indices were characterized by Archimedes' method and the mechanical behavior evaluated by Vickers microhardness. The results indicate a direct influence of the TiO2 contents (up to 7.5 wt.%) in the improvement of the verified properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据