4.7 Article

Optimized allocation of scooter battery swapping station under demand uncertainty

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102963

关键词

Battery swapping station (BSS); Electric scooter (ES); Monte Carlo simulation (MCS); Stochastic optimization; Uncertainty

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [MOST 108-2218-E-224-004-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to develop an optimized allocation model to solve the problem of stochastic battery swapping demand. Through Monte Carlo simulation to predict battery swapping demand, and using optimizers to determine the best BSS locations to minimize costs.
Appropriately allocating battery swapping stations (BSSs) encourages drivers to use battery-operated scooters (ES) for reducing air pollution. The stochastic nature of battery swapping (BS) has not been widely discussed. Also, relatively few models have been proposed to, with particular reference to the possible demand for battery swapping, optimize the BSS locations and the appropriate number of batteries provided for the users of ESs to swap depleted batteries. Hence, this study aims to develop an optimized allocation model of grid-based scooter BSS (OAMSBSS) to be used to solve the abovementioned problem. First, using Monte Carlo simulation for problem-solving operations, along with the consideration given to the traffic flow and population distribution, the stochastic BS model used to predict the demand of stochastic BS was proposed to estimate the various possible scenarios of BSD. Each scenario involved the location decisions and the time distribution for battery swapping demand. Optimizers were adopted to optimally allocate the BSS to both satisfy the BS demand scenarios and achieve the minimal BSS construction cost. The optimized locations of BSSs are considered to not only cost lower land rentals but also help a large number of drivers faced with the problem of the demand for BS services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据