4.7 Article

Understanding the public's behavior in adopting green stormwater infrastructure

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102815

关键词

Green infrastructure; Stormwater management; Adoption behavior; Perception; Generalized ordered logit model

资金

  1. South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium
  2. State of South Carolina through NOAA [NA18OAR4170091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that household characteristics significantly influence the intention to adopt GSI practices, while adoption barriers and ecosystem services only became significant factors in a few models.
Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) is promoted to sustainably manage stormwater in the United States. Aside from mitigating floods, it provides other ecosystem services such as improved water quality, scenic beauty, and an increase in property values of surrounding houses, among others. Because of the importance of community participation in the success of GSI, we investigated the factors affecting the household's intention to adopt GSI practices on their properties. We sent out an online survey to the coastal residents from eight coastal counties of South Carolina. The final samples included 1,031 residents. Using generalized ordered logit models (GOLM), we assessed the factors affecting their level of intention to adopt three common GSI practices- rain gardens, rooftop disconnection, and rain barrels. We also applied logit regression to identify the determinants of their intention to adopt one or more GSI practices. Household characteristics such as age, house ownership, property flooding history, and perception of flooding impacts and stormwater management were found to be significant in most of the models. On the other hand, only a few adoption barriers and ES became significant across the models. The findings of this study could help stormwater professionals in encouraging residents to participate in onsite stormwater management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据