4.7 Article

Optimization of hydrolysis conditions for the production of protein hydrolysates from fish wastes using response surface methodology

期刊

FOOD BIOSCIENCE
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101312

关键词

Fish protein hydrolysate; Optimization; Degree of hydrolysis; Protein recovery

资金

  1. Ordu University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (ODU/BAP) [BD-1701, AR-1646]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydrolysis of trout, anchovy, and whiting wastes was investigated in this study, and the hydrolysis conditions were optimized. It was found that different degrees of hydrolysis and protein recovery can be obtained depending on the type of fish waste and enzyme.
The recycling of waste from food processing is an important industrial procedure for obtaining protein sources with high added value. In this study, trout (Onchorynchus mykiss), anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus), and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) wastes were hydrolyzed. The hydrolyzation procedure was investigated under the optimum predicted conditions defined by time, temperature, and enzyme ratio (E/S) using alkaline protease (pH 8), Protamex (pH 7), and Flavourzyme (pH 7). The hydrolysis conditions that showed the best degree of hydrolysis (DH%) were optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) with the central composite design (CCD) and Box-Behnken design (BBD) models. The effects of three independent variables, temperature (40-60 degrees C), time (1-8 h), and enzyme concentrations (1-2%), were examined for model optimization. It was determined that the DH% varies between 50.92% and 74.30% according to the type of fish waste and enzyme. The highest degree of hydrolysis was observed from trout waste (74.30%) and the lowest degree from whiting waste (50.92%) with Flavourenzyme. From this study, it has been shown that different degrees of hydrolysis and protein recovery can be obtained, depending on fish species, waste composition, enzyme type, and hydrolysis method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据