4.7 Article

Primordial metallic melt in the deep mantle

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 3693-3699

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016GL068560

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Frontiers of Earth Systems Dynamics grant [EAR-1135452]
  2. European Research Council [291432]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [PMPDP2_151256]
  4. Carnegie (Geophysical Laboratory) postdoctoral fellowship
  5. NSF [EAR-1135382, EAR-1215745, EAR-1426772]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1215745, 1135452] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Directorate For Geosciences
  8. Division Of Earth Sciences [1426772] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Earth Sciences [1135452, 1215745] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PMPDP2_151256] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seismic tomography models reveal two large low shear velocity provinces (LLSVPs) that identify large-scale variations in temperature and composition in the deep mantle. Other characteristics include elevated density, elevated bulk sound speed, and sharp boundaries. We show that properties of LLSVPs can be explained by the presence of small quantities (0.3-3%) of suspended, dense Fe-Ni-S liquid. Trapping of metallic liquid is demonstrated to be likely during the crystallization of a dense basal magma ocean, and retention of such melts is consistent with currently available experimental constraints. Calculated seismic velocities and densities of lower mantle material containing low-abundance metallic liquids match the observed LLSVP properties. Small quantities of metallic liquids trapped at depth provide a natural explanation for primitive noble gas signatures in plume-related magmas. Our model hence provides a mechanism for generating large-scale chemical heterogeneities in Earth's early history and makes clear predictions for future tests of our hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据