4.5 Article

Case Report: Two Chinese Infants of Sengers Syndrome Caused by Mutations in AGK Gene

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.639687

关键词

Sengers syndrome; acylglycerol kinase; mutation; genotype; cardiomyopathy; hypertrophic

资金

  1. Qingdao Outstanding Health Professional Development Fund [Qingdao FPCSE 2017-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sengers syndrome is a rare genetic disorder characterized by cardiomyopathy, cataracts, myopathy, and lactic acidosis. Genetic testing and combination therapy can improve symptoms, with parents potentially being carriers of the mutated gene.
Sengers syndrome (OMIM #212350) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to mutations in acylglycerol kinase (AGK) gene. We report two cases that were diagnosed clinically and confirmed genetically. Both infants had typical clinical features characterized by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, bilateral cataracts, myopathy, and lactic acidosis, and heart failure was the most severe manifestation. Genetic testing of a boy revealed a homozygous pathogenic variant for Sengers syndrome in AGK (c.1131+2T>C) which was classified as likely pathogenic according to the ACMG guideline; besides, his skeletal muscle biopsy and transmission electron microscope presented obvious abnormity. One girl had compound heterozygous (c.409C>T and c.390G>A) variants of AGK gene that was identified in the proband and further Sanger sequencing indicated that the parents carried a single heterozygous mutation each. After the administration of cocktail therapy including coenzyme Q10, carnitine, and vitamin B complex, as well as ACEI, heart failure and myopathy of the boy were significantly improved and the condition was stable after 1-year follow-up, while the cardiomyopathy of the girl is not progressive but the plasma lactate acid increased significantly. We present the first report of two infants with Sengers syndrome diagnosed via exome sequencing in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据