4.6 Article

Contours of citizen science: a vignette study

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.202108

关键词

Citizen science; open science; vignette survey

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [824580]
  2. project EU-Citizen.Science (The Platform for Sharing, Initiating, and Learning Citizen Science in Europe)
  3. ERC Advanced Grant project European Citizen Science: Analysis and Visualisation [694767]
  4. CRI Research Fellowships
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [694767] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The definition and boundaries of citizen science have been a challenge, with differing opinions; a survey using case descriptions was conducted to explore the criteria for measuring citizen science activities; the results demonstrated a plurality of understanding of citizen science and called for an open understanding of the field.
Citizen science has expanded rapidly over the past decades. Yet, defining citizen science and its boundaries remained a challenge, and this is reflected in the literature-for example in the proliferation of typologies and definitions. There is a need for identifying areas of agreement and disagreement within the citizen science practitioners community on what should be considered as citizen science activity. This paper describes the development and results of a survey that examined this issue, through the use of vignettes-short case descriptions that describe an activity, while asking the respondents to rate the activity on a scale from 'not citizen science' (0%) to 'citizen science' (100%). The survey included 50 vignettes, of which five were developed as clear cases of not-citizen science activities, five as widely accepted citizen science activities and the others addressing 10 factors and 61 sub-factors that can lead to controversy about an activity. The survey has attracted 333 respondents, who provided over 5100 ratings. The analysis demonstrates the plurality of understanding of what citizen science is and calls for an open understanding of what activities are included in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据