Abstract concepts in interaction: the need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions

concepts (ACs, e.g. 'justice') are more complex compared with concrete concepts (CCs) (e.g. 'table'). Indeed, they do not possess a single object as a referent, they assemble quite heterogeneous members and they are more detached from exteroceptive and more grounded in interoceptive experience. Recent views have hypothesized that interpersonal communication is particularly crucial to acquire and use ACs. The current study investigates the reliance of ACs/CCs representation on interpersonal behaviour. We asked participants to perform a motor interaction task with two avatars who embodied two real confederates. Before and after the motor interaction task, the two confederates provided participants with hints in a concept guessing task associated with visual stimuli: one helped in guessing ACs and the other, CCs. A control study we performed both with the materials employed in the main experiment and with other materials, confirmed that associating verbal concepts with visual images was more difficult with ACs than with CCs. Consistently, the results of the main experiment showed that participants asked for more hints with ACs than CCs and were more synchronous when interacting with the avatar corresponding to the AC's confederate. The results highlight an important role of sociality in grounding ACs.

Automated summary

This study found that concepts are more complex and grounded in interoceptive experience compared to concrete concepts. Interpersonal communication plays a crucial role in acquiring and using concepts. The results demonstrated that associating verbal concepts with visual images was more difficult with abstract concepts than with concrete concepts, and participants requested more hints and were more synchronous in interacting with the avatars corresponding to abstract concepts' confederates.