☆ 4.6 Article

The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2021)

相关参考文献

注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。

Article Information Science & Library Science

Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers

Amandeep Khatter et al.

Summary: The study found that the majority of COVID-19 research papers are low-quality case series, with few adhering to good reporting standards. It emphasizes the need for cautious interpretation of research findings and the increasingly important role journals play in ensuring high-quality publications.

LEARNED PUBLISHING (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Meeting Health Care Sciences & Services

Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin

Dongguang Wang et al.

Summary: The study assessed the reporting quality of abstracts for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of COVID-19 interventions, finding a significant correlation between abstract word count and reporting scores, as well as identifying multiple spin strategies. Geographical origin was associated with the severity of spin, with research from non-Asian regions containing fewer spin strategies.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Following the science? Comparison of methodological and reporting quality of covid-19 and other research from the first wave of the pandemic

Terence J. Quinn et al.

Summary: After reviewing COVID-19 research papers published from February to May 2020 in major clinical journals, it was found that the methodological and reporting quality of these papers were generally lower compared to non-COVID papers published during the same period.

BMC MEDICINE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

General medical publications during COVID-19 show increased dissemination despite lower validation

Nan Gai et al.

Summary: This study found that COVID-19 related articles in four general medical journals were significantly different from non-COVID articles based on article characteristics and impact metrics. COVID-related studies were generally shorter articles reporting observational studies with less literature cited and fewer study sites, suggestive of more limited scientific support. Nevertheless, they had a much higher dissemination.

PLOS ONE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Calling for improved quality in the registration of traditional Chinese medicine during the public health emergency: a survey of trial registries for COVID-19, H1N1, and SARS

Zhuoran Kuang et al.

Summary: The study assessed the registration quality of traditional Chinese medicine clinical trials for COVID-19, H1N1, and SARS by examining records in the WHO ICTRP and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The findings indicate deficiencies in reporting detailed intervention and outcome information in the registered clinical trials of TCM.

TRIALS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Oncology

Quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines for treating children with COVID-19

Qinyuan Li et al.

Summary: The review found that the current guidelines for treating children with COVID-19 lack high methodological and reporting quality, with significant inconsistencies in recommendations and very limited supporting evidence.

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Reporting and methodological quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews needs to be improved: an evidence mapping

Yanfei Li et al.

Summary: This study assessed the quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews, highlighting trends in clinical topics, author countries, and study populations. Findings showed that the majority of reviews were from developing countries, with generally low quality and a focus on clinical manifestations, etiology, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and prevention of COVID-19.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Consistency of recommendations and methodological quality of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19

Xufei Luo et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the quality of diagnosis and treatment guidelines for COVID-19, finding that most guidelines were of low quality and there was some consistency in recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. The main diagnostic methods recommended were RT-PCR and CT, while supportive therapy was highlighted as the most important treatment option.

JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

How to fight an infodemic

John Zarocostas

LANCET (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Preprints bring ‘firehose’ of outbreak data

Kai Kupferschmidt

SCIENCE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Coronavirus disease 2019: The harms of exaggerated information and non-evidence-based measures

John P. A. Ioannidis

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

COVID-19 coronavirus research has overall low methodological quality thus far: case in point for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine

Paul Elias Alexander et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Against pandemic research exceptionalism

Alex John London et al.

SCIENCE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Rapid publications risk the integrity of science in the era of COVID-19

N. Bagdasarian et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

News Item Multidisciplinary Sciences

COVID-19 RETRACTIONS RAISE CONCERNS ABOUT DATA OVERSIGHT

Heidi Ledford et al.

NATURE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Covidization of research: what are the risks?

Madhukar Pai

NATURE MEDICINE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Ethics

The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality

Katrina A. Bramstedt

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic

Silvia Gianola et al.

PLOS ONE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The COVID-19 social media infodemic

Matteo Cinelli et al.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators

John P. A. Ioannidis et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2020)

添加到收藏夹

News Item Multidisciplinary Sciences

SCIENTISTS FEAR THAT 'COVIDIZATION' IS DISTORTING RESEARCH

David Adam

NATURE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Information Science & Library Science

Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies

Jeroen Baas et al.

QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Review Immunology

The quality of research on mental health related to the COVID-19 pandemic: A note of caution after a systematic review

Ines Nieto et al.

BRAIN, BEHAVIOR, & IMMUNITY - HEALTH (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

The scientists who publish a paper every five days

John P. A. Ioannidis et al.

NATURE (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence

Richard Klavans et al.

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines

John P. A. Ioannidis et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership

Richard Klavans et al.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2010)

添加到收藏夹

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Toward a Consensus Map of Science

Richard Klavans et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2009)

添加到收藏夹

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.