4.7 Article

The effect of TiB2 ceramic particles on Portevin-Le Chatelier behavior of TiB2/AlMg metal matrix composites

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.135

关键词

TiB2 particles; Metal matrix composites; Portevin-Le Chatelier; Dislocation; Modeling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971137, 11875192, U1930101]
  2. Tescan, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal matrix composites (MMCs) have excellent mechanical properties and the influence of TiB2 ceramic particles on Portevin-Le Chatelier (PLC) behavior in a TiB2/AlMg composite is systematically investigated in this study. The presence of particles decreases the critical strain of PLC at high strain rate, but the difference becomes smaller with decreasing strain rate. The dual effects of particles on dislocation waiting time are discussed, showing that the effect of particles weakens with decreasing strain rate.
Metal matrix composites (MMCs) have attracted extensive attention due to their excellent mechanical properties. However, the Portevin-Le Chatelier (PLC) behavior of MMCs considering the interaction of reinforced particles and dislocations is rarely reported. In the present study, the influence of TiB2 ceramic particles on PLC behavior is systematically investigated in a TiB2/AlMg composite. It is found that particles decrease the critical strain of PLC at high strain rate (>0.01 s(-1)) compared with AlMg alloy, but their difference becomes small with the decrease of strain rate. The dual effects of particles are discussed in terms of dislocation waiting time based on experimental characterizations and theoretical modeling. It is shown that with the presence of particles, the waiting time increases at high strain rate, leading to the decrease of critical strain, but the proportion of additional waiting time induced by particles in overall waiting time gradually decreases with the decrease of strain rate, leading to the weakening of the effect of particles. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据