4.7 Article

Investigation on the flow limitation during copper electroplating of polyurethane foam

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.070

关键词

Copper foam; Electroplating; Pore size; Polyurethane; Flow limitation; Diffusion layer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the electroplating of ionic Cu on polymeric foam substrates with different pore sizes, showing that reducing foam pore size leads to decreased coating rates. Pulsed current electroplating resulted in smoother Cu coatings compared to direct current electroplating, with SEM images revealing flower-shaped precipitations and the nucleation and grain growth process. A physical model based on limiting diffusion current (LDC) was used to describe the precipitation mechanism.
The electroplating method was employed to precipitate ionic Cu on the polymeric foam substrate. To compare the effective parameters in the foam electroplating process, open cell polyurethane foams with different pore sizes 30, 35, 40, and 70 ppi (pore per inch) were used. To attain the desired conductivity in polymeric foams, graphite was selected as a pre-coating material. Both direct current and pulsed current were used for electroplating samples. The results show that by reducing the pore size of the foams, significant changes in the ions' hydrodynamic behavior and forces from the electromagnetic field occur. These factors cause the trend of a coating rate to decrease. The magnitude of these changes in the sample with 70 ppi is more severe than in the other samples. It was seen that the precipitated Cu on the foam through the pulsed current electroplating method was smoother than its counterpart produced by a direct current electroplating method. Flower shaped precipitations were observed in SEM images showing the nucleation and grain growth process. A physical model has described the precipitation mechanism according to the limiting diffusion current (LDC). (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据