4.4 Article

Adeno-associated viral vector serotype 9-based gene replacement therapy for SURF1-related Leigh syndrome

期刊

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.09.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cure Mito Foundation
  2. Taysha Gene Therapies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the gene replacement therapy with AAV9/hSURF1 significantly improved complex IV activity and content, and effectively alleviated biochemical abnormalities induced by SURF1 deficiency. Additionally, the treatment also mitigated blood lactic acidosis and demonstrated no significant toxicity in animal studies.
SURF1 (surfeit locus protein 1)-related Leigh syndrome is an early-onset neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by reduction in complex IV activity, resulting in disrupted mitochondrial function. Currently, there are no treatment options available. To test our hypothesis that adeno-associated viral vector serotype 9 (AAV9)/human SURF1 (hSURF1) gene replacement therapy can provide a potentially meaningful and long-term therapeutic benefit, we conducted preclinical efficacy studies using SURF1 knockout mice and safety evaluations with wild-type (WT) mice. Our data indicate that with a single intrathecal (i.t.) administration, our treatment partially and significantly rescued complex IV activity in all tissues tested, including liver, brain, and muscle. Accordingly, complex IV content (examined via MT-CO1 protein expression level) also increased with our treatment. In a separate group of mice, AAV9/hSURF1 mitigated the blood lactic acidosis induced by exhaustive exercise at 9 months post-dosing. A toxicity study in WT mice showed no adverse effects in either the in-life portion or after microscopic examination of major tissues up to a year following the same treatment regimen. Taken together, our data suggest a single dose, i.t. administration of AAV9/hSURF1 is safe and effective in improving biochemical abnormalities induced by SURF1 deficiency with potential applicability for SURF1-related Leigh syndrome patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据