4.2 Article

Application of microbial fuel cells energized by oil palm trunk sap (OPTS) to remove the toxic metal from synthetic wastewater with generation of electricity

期刊

APPLIED NANOSCIENCE
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 1949-1961

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-021-01885-6

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Electricity; Synthetic wastewater; Metal ions; Conductive pili

资金

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia (Malaysia) [304/PKIMIA/6501153/E128]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that using oil palm trunk sap as an organic substrate can improve the performance of microbial fuel cells (MFCs), resulting in higher power density and removal rates. Through biological identification, it was discovered that bacterial species with conductive pili are beneficial for metal removal and energy generation. According to the parameter optimization results, room temperature and a pH of 7 are ideal conditions for the industrial-scale application of MFCs.
Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) is the bioelectrochemical typed approach in which bacterial species generate electricity and remove the metal ions from synthetic wastewater. To improve the performance of MFCs, a local oil palm trunk sap (OPTS) was used in the present study as an organic substrate to improve the bacterial activities. The present electrochemical and biological characterizations proved that OPTS can deliver good efficiency in MFCs operations. The maximum obtained power density was 0.37 mW/m(2) and a current density of 55.26 mA/m(2). Similarly, the obtained removal rate for Pb2+, Cd2+, Cr3+, Ni2+, Co2+ and Hg2+ was 75%, 70.10%, 75%, 80%, 78.10% and 60%, respectively. During biological characterization, conductive pili-type bacterial species such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacillus species, Lysinibacillus, and Enterobacter were found for metal removal and energy generation. Additionally, the parameter optimization showed that room temperature and pH 7 are ideal conditions for the industrial-scale application of the MFCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据