4.2 Article

Effect of inclusion of nanoparticles on unsteady heat transfer

期刊

APPLIED NANOSCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-021-01960-y

关键词

Phase-change material; Freezing; Nano-powder; Adaptive grid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article simulated the freezing phenomenon in a rectangular inner cylinder containing cold flow, using NEPCM mixture and considering factors such as nanomaterial diameter and outer wall amplitude. The study showed that increasing the value of A can reduce freezing time, while the influence of A on T-ave is insignificant within certain time ranges. Additionally, the diameter of nano-powder was found to affect solidification time, with an optimum value observed in experimental observations.
New geometry with rectangular inner cylinder containing cold flow has been simulated in this article. Freezing phenomenon has been simulated and NEPCM was mixture of CuO and water. Time-dependent solid fraction term was added to energy equation. Software based on FEM with adaptive grid was implemented for modeling the problem. Diameter of nanomaterial and amplitude of outer wall were assumed as variable. To reach the reliability of assumption of neglecting buoyancy term, comparison with experimental data was illustrated. Providing greater value of A makes the freezing time to reduce about 5.82% which is associated with existence of more NEPCM near the rectangular cylinder when A = 0.3. Influence of A on T-ave has no sensible impact for t < 70 s and t > 320 s. Increasing diameter of nano-powder can augment the conductivity but experimental observation shows that there is optimum value for this factor. As d(p) augments from 30 to 50 nm and 40 nm, the time of solidification alters from 186.57 s to 222.77 s and 149.37 s. With rise of d(p), at first, the time declines about 19.98% then time augments about 49.16%. When A = 0.3 and d(p) = 40 nm, the quickest process takes place and it takes 149.37 s to reach full freezing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据