4.6 Article

Stable Mercury Isotopes Revealing Photochemical Processes in the Marine Boundary Layer

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021JD034630

关键词

marine boundary layer; mercury isotope; oxidation; particulate bound mercury; photoreduction

资金

  1. Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China [01-01-02E]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41830647, 41625012, 41961144028, 41941014, 91544103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the transformation mechanisms of mercury in the marine boundary layer, finding limited contribution of continental anthropogenic emissions to particulate bound mercury (PBM). The study suggested that PBM likely experienced oxidation of Hg-0 by Br radicals and subsequent adsorption of Hg2+, as well as photoreduction influenced by organic compounds. The research highlights the significant role of photoreduction in influencing mercury in the MBL.
The marine boundary layer (MBL) is an important transportation and reaction zone of atmospheric mercury on Earth. However, the transformation mechanisms of Hg in the MBL remain unclear. In this study, total suspended particle samples were collected in the MBL during two cruises, and the levels of particulate bound mercury (PBM) and mercury isotopes were analyzed. The results showed that (a) continental anthropogenic emissions have limited contribution to PBM in the MBL; (b) PBM likely experienced the oxidation of Hg-0 by Br radicals and subsequent adsorption of Hg2+ on to particulate surfaces, as inferred from the significant negative delta Hg-202; (c) the Delta Hg-199/Delta Hg-201 ratio of similar to 1.0 suggests that PBM underwent photoreduction, which was influenced by organic compounds, and the contribution of photoreduction to the extent of odd-number mass-independent fractionation in PBM in the MBL was more significant than that of oxidation triggered by Br atoms. This study provides insights into the photochemical processes influencing mercury in the MBL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据