4.6 Review

Evidence of Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Cognitive Intervention in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.713671

关键词

aerobic exercise; mild cognitive impairment; RCTs; systematic review; meta-analysis

资金

  1. Graduate Students Innovation Program of Chongqing [CYS21086]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Southwest University [SWU1709240]
  3. Medical Research Program Project of Chongqing Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission [2015ZDXM034]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Tongji University [22120180511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regular aerobic exercise significantly improves cognitive function in older adults with MCI, as indicated by improvements in MMSE and MoCA scores. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting these findings due to the limitations of the study.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of aerobic exercise as a cognitive intervention for older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline databases were searched from their inception until 30 April 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of aerobic exercise on global cognitive function in older adults with MCI were included. Ten eligible trials with acceptable methodological quality were identified. The meta-analysis results showed that aerobic exercise significantly improved the MMSE (N = 956, MD = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.28-0.92, p = 0.0003, I-2 = 31%, fixed effects model) and MoCA scores (N = 398, MD = 1.67, 95% CI. 1.18-2.15, p < 0.0001, I-2 = 37%, fixed-effects model) and overall cognitive performance in patients with MCI. The results of this study suggest that participation in regular aerobic exercise can improve cognitive function in older adults with MCI. These findings should be used with caution considering the limitations of the study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据