4.6 Article

Epidemiological Analysis of Rabies in Central China from 2013 to 2018

期刊

INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 2753-2762

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S314881

关键词

rabies; epidemiology; China

资金

  1. Hubei Young Talent Plan
  2. Hubei Medical Youth Reserve Talent program
  3. Hubei Technological Innovation Plan [2017ADC061]
  4. Hubei Outstanding Medical Academic Leader Program [20131016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to understand the epidemiological status of rabies in Central China from 2013 to 2018, showing a severe situation with almost 100% fatality rate. Rural population remains the most vulnerable group to rabies, characterized by high exposure ratio, low treatment rate, and poor vaccination compliance. Further studies with larger populations are needed to validate the findings.
Objective: The study aimed to timely grasp the epidemiologic status of rabies in Central China from 2013 to 2018 and provide scientific evidence for the implementation of follow-up prevention and control measures. Methods: We initiated a retrospective observational and descriptive study of bite-related injuries data and rabies disease data in Hubei province from 2013 to 2018, managed by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Results: A total of 2,028,691 individuals were exposed to bites from 2013 to 2018, of which 221 were diagnosed with rabies and deceased. Among those cases, the incubation periods of rabies varied from 3 days to 18,406 days, which has been shown to be statistically associated with where the infected person was exposed and whether the wound care has been conducted. Conclusion: Epidemiological studies have shown that from 2013 to 2018, the current situation of rabies in Central China is still severe. The case fatality rate keeps virtually 100%. The rural population is still the most vulnerable group to rabies, characterized by a high exposure ratio and low treatment rate as well as poor vaccination compliance. Hoewever, larger populations are warranted to validate our findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据