4.6 Review

Cancer Biomarkers Discovery of Methylation Modification With Direct High-Throughput Nanopore Sequencing

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.672804

关键词

nanopore sequencing; cancer biomarker; Cas9 enrichment; DNA methylation; RNA methylation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82060524]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Outstanding Young Talents Training Program of Jiangxi Province [20192BCBL23017]
  3. Youth Jinggang Scholars Program in Jiangxi Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanopore sequencing technology allows for direct detection of base modifications in DNA and RNA, compared to bisulfite sequencing. The CRISPR/Cas9-targeted enrichment nanopore sequencing techniques are simple and cost-effective, particularly when targeting specific genomic regions.
Cancer is a complex disease, driven by a combination of genetic and epigenetic alterations. DNA and RNA methylation modifications are the most common epigenetic events that play critical roles in cancer development and progression. Bisulfite converted sequencing is a widely used technique to detect base modifications in DNA methylation, but its main drawbacks lie in DNA degradation, lack of specificity, or short reads with low sequence diversity. The nanopore sequencing technology can directly detect base modifications in native DNA as well as RNA without harsh chemical treatment, compared to bisulfite sequencing. Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9-targeted enrichment nanopore sequencing techniques are straightforward and cost-effective when targeting genomic regions are of interest. In this review, we mainly focus on DNA and RNA methylation modification detection in cancer with the current nanopore sequencing approaches. We also present the respective strengths, weaknesses of nanopore sequencing techniques, and their future translational applications in identification of epigenetic biomarkers for cancer detection and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据