4.6 Review

Mechanism-Centric Approaches for Biomarker Detection and Precision Therapeutics in Cancer

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.687813

关键词

biomarkers; treatment response; precision medicine; predictive models; mechanism-centric approaches

资金

  1. Rutgers start-up funds [R01LM013236-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlights the significance of identifying driver biomarkers through mechanism-centric approaches for discovering meaningful biomarkers. This includes computational methods such as gene co-expression networks and protein-protein interaction networks. Future directions emphasize the importance of model interpretability and data integration in biomarker discovery and precision therapeutics.
Biomarker discovery is at the heart of personalized treatment planning and cancer precision therapeutics, encompassing disease classification and prognosis, prediction of treatment response, and therapeutic targeting. However, many biomarkers represent passenger rather than driver alterations, limiting their utilization as functional units for therapeutic targeting. We suggest that identification of driver biomarkers through mechanism-centric approaches, which take into account upstream and downstream regulatory mechanisms, is fundamental to the discovery of functionally meaningful markers. Here, we examine computational approaches that identify mechanism-centric biomarkers elucidated from gene co-expression networks, regulatory networks (e.g., transcriptional regulation), protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, and molecular pathways. We discuss their objectives, advantages over gene-centric approaches, and known limitations. Future directions highlight the importance of input and model interpretability, method and data integration, and the role of recently introduced technological advantages, such as single-cell sequencing, which are central for effective biomarker discovery and time-cautious precision therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据