4.6 Article

Nucleolipid Acid-Based Nanocarriers Restore Neuronal Lysosomal Acidification Defects

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.736554

关键词

nucleolipid; nanocarrier; oil-in-water nanoemulsion; lysosome; pH; acidification; neurodegenerative disease

资金

  1. IDEX Emergence [OPE-2018-410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lysosomal dysfunction plays a pathogenic role in neurodegenerative diseases, with regulating lysosomal pH being a key factor in combating neurodegeneration. Crossing the Blood-Brain-Barrier is crucial for developing chronic treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.
Increasing evidence suggests that lysosomal dysfunction has a pathogenic role in neurodegenerative diseases. In particular, an increase in lysosomal pH has been reported in different cellular models of Parkinson's disease. Thus, targeting lysosomes has emerged as a promising approach. More specifically, regulating its pH could play a central role against the neurodegeneration process. To date, only a few agents specifically targeting lysosomal pH are reported in the literature, partly due to the challenge of crossing the Blood-Brain-Barrier (BBB), preventing drug penetration into the central nervous system (CNS). To develop chronic treatments for neurodegenerative diseases, crossing the BBB is crucial. We report herein the conception and synthesis of an innovative DNA derivative-based nanocarrier. Nucleolipids, carrying a biocompatible organic acid as an active ingredient, were designed and synthesized as prodrugs. They were successfully incorporated into an oil-in-water nanoemulsion vehicle to cross biological membranes and then release effectively biocompatible acidic components to restore the functional lysosomal pH of neuronal cells. Biological assays on a genetic cell model of Parkinson's disease highlighted the non-toxicity of such nucleolipids after cellular uptake and their ability (at c = 40 mu M) to fully restore lysosomal acidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据