4.7 Article

A new GIS-compatible methodology for visibility analysis in digital surface models of earth sites

期刊

GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

CHINA UNIV GEOSCIENCES, BEIJING
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.11.006

关键词

Digital surface model; Visibility analysis; Topographic data processing; Obstacle object; Permeability

资金

  1. [133/2016/RPP-TO - 1/b]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Visibility analysis, an essential feature in GIS tools, is enhanced with a new method presented in this article that calculates visibility through partly permeable obstacles using a quasi-Monte Carlo simulation with 100 iterations. The method offers greater accuracy and ease of implementation, and its incorporation in GIS software can benefit various fields such as architecture, archaeology, radio communication, and the military.
As a GIS tool, visibility analysis is used in many areas to evaluate both visible and non-visible places. Visibility analysis builds on a digital surface model describing the terrain morphology, including the position and shapes of all objects that can sometimes act as visibility barriers. However, some barriers, for example vegetation, may be permeable to a certain degree. Despite extensive research and use of visibility analysis in different areas, standard GIS tools do not take permeability into account. This article presents a new method to calculate visibility through partly permeable obstacles. The method is based on a quasi-Monte Carlo simulation with 100 iterations of visibility calculation. Each iteration result represents 1% of vegetation permeability, which can thus range from 1% to 100% visibility behind vegetation obstacles. The main advantage of the method is greater accuracy of visibility results and easy implementation on any GIS software. The incorporation of the proposed method in GIS software would facilitate work in many fields, such as architecture, archaeology, radio communication, and the military. (C) 2021 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据