4.7 Article

The effect of material and process parameters on the surface energy of polycaprolactone fibre layers

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109748

关键词

Nanofibres; Polycaprolactone; Electrospinning; Surface energy; Wetting

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
  2. European Union [CZ.02.1.01/0. 0/0.0/16_019/0000843]
  3. project of the Specific University Research Grant by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [21403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experiment studied the effects of different solvent systems and two electrospinning methods on the surface energy, resulting in nanofibrous materials with varying surface energies and different degrees of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity in the produced fiber layers.
The experiment involved the study of differences between the surface energy of various fibrous layers. The experimental approach was based on changes in several parameters such as the concentration of the polymeric solution, differences in the molecular weight, the use of different solvents and the method applied for the preparation of the samples. All the experiments considered nanofibrous materials based on polycaprolactone that had been electrospun using the direct and alternating current electrospinning approaches. In addition, polymer foils from the spinning solutions were prepared as reference materials. The contact angle and surface energy were measured for all the prepared materials (foils and layers). The experiment led to the conclusion that the use of different solvent systems and the two electrospinning approaches produces materials with differing surface energies and, thus, with differing degrees of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the produced fibre layers. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据