4.7 Article

High-performance CrN tight ultrafiltration membranes prepared by in situ gas-solid catalytic reaction

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109669

关键词

Ultrafiltration membrane; Chromium nitride; Catalytic reaction; Sintering

资金

  1. Open Fund of National Joint Engineering Research Center for Abrasion Control and Molding of Metal Materials
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2018MEM008]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [FRF-TP-18-009A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-performance CrN tight ultrafiltration membranes were prepared by in situ gas-solid reaction using Cr2O3 as a nanoprecursor and TiO2 as a nitriding catalyst. The membranes exhibited enhanced hydrophilicity, no cracks or pinholes, high water flux, and retention rates for dyes, with Ti4+ identified as a key factor influencing phase transformation and performance stability.
To expand the industrial application of membranes, high-performance CrN tight ultrafiltration membranes (UF) were prepared by in situ gas-solid reaction using Cr2O3 as a nanoprecursor and TiO2 as a nitriding catalyst in ammonia atmosphere. The phase composition and microstructure of CrN UF membranes were characterized by X-ray diffraction and field-emission scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The effects of TiO2 and sintering parameters on the crystalline phase and pore size of CrN UF membranes were investigated. The results identified Ti4+ as a key factor influencing the transformation of the Cr2O3 phase into the CrN phase. The as-prepared CrN membranes exhibited enhanced hydrophilicity, no cracks or pinholes, water flux of 121 L.m(-2)h(-1) bar(-1), and a molecular weight cut-off of 1500 Da. The membranes also had retention rates of 100% for methyl blue (50 ppm) and 90% for methylene blue (50 ppm), which almost remained constant under repeated use. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据