4.8 Article

PSL-MAAKA: Provably Secure and Lightweight Mutual Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol for Fully Public Channels in Internet of Medical Things

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 8, 期 17, 页码 13183-13195

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3055827

关键词

Sensors; Protocols; Security; Authentication; Password; Intelligent sensors; Wireless sensor networks; Internet of Medical Things (IoMT); key agreement; mutual authentication; provably secure; random oracle model

资金

  1. NSFC [U20A20175, U1808207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a lightweight and secure MAAKA protocol for IoMT, utilizing hash and XOR operations for efficient authentication and key agreement, proving security with the random oracle model, satisfying security requirements in IoMT, and demonstrating optimal performance compared to other competing schemes in terms of communication overhead, computation overhead, and storage overhead.
Designing efficient and secure mutual authentication and key agreement (MAAKA) protocols for Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) has been shown to be challenging, mainly due to the different security and privacy requirements in complex settings. Existing schemes generally are subject to a number of limitations, ranging from performance to security issues. In this article, we introduce a provably secure and lightweight MAAKA (PSL-MAAKA) protocol for fully public channels in IoMT. First, the proposed scheme is lightweight since the major operations in the stage of authentication and key agreement are hash operation and XOR operation, respectively. Second, this article proves the security of the presented protocol taking the advantage of the random oracle model. Next, this article gives that security requirements in IoMT could be satisfied through our presented MAAKA protocol. Finally, we demonstrate that it enjoys optimal performance than other competing schemes, in terms of communication overhead, computation overhead, and storage overhead.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据