4.7 Article

Cyclic cooling of quantum systems at the saturation limit

期刊

NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-021-00408-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC project SMeL
  2. DFG [FOR2724, SFB/TR21]
  3. EU ASTERIQS
  4. QIA
  5. Max Planck Society
  6. Volkswagenstiftung
  7. Baden-Wuerttemberg Foundation
  8. Sharif University of Technology [G960219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research demonstrates the possibility of surpassing the physical limits of spin polarization and achieving higher saturation limits in spin cooling using heat-bath algorithmic cooling schemes. Experimental evidence of the saturation of the HBAC limit has been observed, exceeding any available polarization in diamond nitrogen vacancy centers.
The achievable bounds of cooling quantum systems, and the possibility to violate them is not well-explored experimentally. For example, among the common methods to enhance spin polarization (cooling), one utilizes the low temperature and high-magnetic field condition or employs a resonant exchange with highly polarized spins. The achievable polarization, in such cases, is bounded either by Boltzmann distribution or by energy conservation. Heat-bath algorithmic cooling schemes (HBAC), on the other hand, have shown the possibility to surpass the physical limit set by the energy conservation and achieve a higher saturation limit in spin cooling. Despite, the huge theoretical progress, and few principle demonstrations, neither the existence of the limit nor its application in cooling quantum systems towards the maximum achievable limit have been experimentally verified. Here, we show the experimental saturation of the HBAC limit for single nuclear spins, beyond any available polarization in solid-state spin system, the Nitrogen-Vacancy centers in diamond. We benchmark the performance of our experiment over a range of variable reset polarizations (bath temperatures), and discuss the role of quantum coherence in HBAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据