4.2 Article

Estimating basis functions in massive fields under the spatial mixed effects model

期刊

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND DATA MINING
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 430-448

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sam.11537

关键词

alternating expectation conditional maximization algorithm; bandwidth; basis functions; fixed rank kriging; maximum likelihood estimation; range parameter

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [IOW03617]
  2. Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
  3. Consortium for Nonproliferation Enabling Capabilities (CNEC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discusses a new method for spatial prediction, utilizing a spatial mixed effects model to estimate the spatial dependence range between observations and knots, improving estimation accuracy and reducing computational burden.
Spatial prediction is commonly achieved under the assumption of a Gaussian random field by obtaining maximum likelihood estimates of parameters, and then using the kriging equations to arrive at predicted values. For massive datasets, fixed rank kriging using the expectation-maximization algorithm for estimation has been proposed as an alternative to the usual but computationally prohibitive kriging method. The method reduces computation cost of estimation by redefining the spatial process as a linear combination of basis functions and spatial random effects. A disadvantage of this method is that it imposes constraints on the relationship between the observed locations and the knots. We develop an alternative method that utilizes the spatial mixed effects model, but allows for additional flexibility by estimating the range of the spatial dependence between the observations and the knots via an alternating expectation conditional maximization algorithm. Experiments show that our methodology improves estimation without sacrificing prediction accuracy while also minimizing the additional computational burden of extra parameter estimation. The methodology is applied to a temperature dataset archived by the United States National Climate Data Center, with improved results over previous methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据