4.7 Article

Fermionic decays of NMSSM Higgs bosons under LHC 13 TeV constraints

期刊

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104464

关键词

NMSSM; Higgs sector; Fermionic decays; LHC constraints

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research in King Saud University
  2. initiative of DSR Graduate Students Research Support (GSR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of recent LHC constraints on the Higgs sector in the semi-constrained version of the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, focusing on the parameter space where the Higgs doublet-singlet coupling and the ratio between the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets are at extreme values. The analysis presents possible fermionic decay channels and reduced cross-sections for the lightest neutral Higgs bosons in the NMSSM, showing high branching ratios for non SM-like Higgs into bottom quarks at lower Higgs masses. Moreover, it is found that the branching ratio of h(2)/a(1) -> t (t) over bar can reach unity for all mass ranges when these bosons are mostly singlet.
This paper investigates the impact of the recent LHC constraints on the Higgs sector in the semi-constrained version of the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. Our analysis focuses on the parameter space for which the value of the Higgs doublet-singlet coupling, lambda, is large as possible, while the ratio between the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, tan beta, is small as possible. Under the current constraints, we present the possible fermionic decay channels and reduced cross-section into fermions final states for the lightest neutral Higgs bosons in the NMSSM, (h(1), h(2), and a(1)). We found that the branching ratios of the non SM-like Higgs (a(1) and h(2)) into a pair of bottom quarks are near 90% level when the Higgs mass below 400 GeV. Moreover, the branching ratio of h(2)/a(1) -> t (t) over bar can reach unity for all mass ranges when these bosons are mostly singlet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据