4.6 Article

The Effect of Immunobiotic/Psychobiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus Strain INMIA 9602 Er 317/402 Narine on Gut Prevotella in Familial Mediterranean Fever: Gender-Associated Effects

期刊

PROBIOTICS AND ANTIMICROBIAL PROTEINS
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 1306-1315

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12602-021-09779-3

关键词

Prevotella; Immunobiotic Narine; Psychobiotic; Gut microbiota; Familial Mediterranean fever; Depression level; Patients' gender

资金

  1. State Committee of Science Armenia [10-15/I-5, EAPI2020-065]
  2. International Science and Technology Center [A-1980]
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2019-1880]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlights the potential influence of sex-dependent differences on gut microbiota, specifically in relation to the Prevotella genus and its association with depressive disorders in FMF patients. It also demonstrates gender-specific effects of immunobiotic/psychobiotic intervention on gut Prevotella abundance and depression scores in FMF patients.
Possible mechanisms involved in sex-dependent differences in the gut microbiota have a growing interest worldwide, but the effects of probiotics dependence on the gender of the host have remained outside of researchers' attention until now. Previously, our research data described gender-specific differences in the gut microbiota of Armenian Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients. Taking into account the possible association of Prevotella spp. with depressive disorders, the aim of the current investigations was an evaluation of changes in the abundance of gut Prevotella of FMF patients in association with the patient's depression and gender. The differences between healthy and FMF diseased gut microbiota in terms of Prevotella abundance were revealed. In addition, the gender-dependent effects of immunobiotic/psychobiotic Narine on the abundance of gut Prevotella of FMF patients and patients' depression scores were shown by us in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据