4.4 Article

A taxonomic study of Nemania from China, with six new species

期刊

MYCOKEYS
卷 -, 期 83, 页码 39-67

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.83.69906

关键词

phylogeny; six new species; taxonomy; Xylariaceae

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32000009, 31960005, U1812403-4-4]
  2. Fund of the Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province [[2020]1Y059]
  3. Fund of Special Project of Academic New Seedling Cultivation and Innovation Exploration in Guizhou Medical University [[2018]5779-64]
  4. Guizhou Province Ordinary Colleges and Universities Youth Science and Technology Talent Growth Project [[2021]154]
  5. Fund of High-Level Innovation Talents [2015-4029]
  6. Base of International Scientific and Technological Cooperation of Guizhou Province [[2017]5802]
  7. 111 Project [D20009]
  8. Talent Base Project of Guizhou Province, China [FCJD2018-22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During an investigation of Xylariaceae in China from 2019 to 2020, isolates representing eight Nemania species were collected, with six of them being new to science, one being a new record for China, and one being a known species. The study provides detailed descriptions of the morphological characteristics of all species, along with discussions on prevailing contradictions in generic concepts.
During an investigation of Xylariaceae from 2019 to 2020, isolates representing eight Nemania (Xylariacese) species were collected from Yunnan, Guizhou and Hainan Provinces in China. Morphological and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, based on combined ITS, alpha-actin, rpb2 and beta-tubulin sequences, confirmed that six of them are new to science, viz. Nemania camelliae, N. changningensis, N. cyclobalanopsina, N. feicuiensis, N. lishuicola and N. rubi; one is a new record (N. caries) for China and one is a known species (N. diffusa). Morphological descriptions and illustrations of all species are detailed. In addition, the characteristics of Nemania are summarised and prevailing contradictions in generic concepts are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据