4.2 Article

Caregiving Stress and Self-Rated Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of Resourcefulness

期刊

ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 982-988

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1924324

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health [T32NR015433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that high caregiving stress and low resourcefulness during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with worse self-rated health among family caregivers, with resourcefulness mediating this relationship. This emphasizes the importance of assessing the psychological impact of the pandemic on family caregivers and targeting resourcefulness skills to improve their health and well-being.
Family caregivers faced unprecedented circumstances and experienced increased levels of stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Resourcefulness can minimize the effect of stress on health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between caregiving stress during the pandemic, resourcefulness, and self-rated health and assess the mediating effect of resourcefulness. A convenience sample of 70 family caregivers of adults with chronic and/or disabling conditions was recruited using social media groups and professional networking platforms. Data were collected using an online survey and analyzed using linear regression. Mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro. Higher levels of caregiving stress during the pandemic and lower levels of resourcefulness were associated with worse self-rated health, while controlling for age, employment status, and weekly caregiving hours. Resourcefulness mediated the relationship between caregiving stress and self-rated health. Our findings highlight the importance of assessing the psychological impact of the pandemic on family caregivers' outcomes. Resourcefulness skills can be targeted to improve the health and well-being of family caregivers during and beyond the pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据