4.8 Article

Functional Fc Gamma Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Long-Term Kidney Allograft Survival

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.724331

关键词

Fc gamma receptor; antibody-mediated rejection; kidney transplantation; anti-HLA antibodies; allograft survival

资金

  1. Austrian National Bank [12471]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The FCGR3A-V/F158 polymorphism was not significantly associated with kidney transplant survival, nor were other activating Fc gamma receptor polymorphisms. There were no significant survival differences among patient subgroups at increased risk of rejection-related injury.
The functional Fc gamma receptor (Fc gamma R) IIIA polymorphism FCGR3A-V/F158 was earlier suggested to determine the potential of donor-specific HLA antibodies to trigger microcirculation inflammation, a key lesion of antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection. Associations with long-term transplant outcomes, however, have not been evaluated to date. To clarify the impact of FCGR3A-V/F158 polymorphism on kidney transplant survival, we genotyped a cohort of 1,940 recipient/donor pairs. Analyzing 10-year death-censored allograft survival, we found no significant differences in relation to FCGR3A-V/F158. There was also no independent survival effect in a multivariable Cox model. Similarly, functional polymorphisms in two other activating Fc gamma R, FCGR2A-H/R131 (Fc gamma RIIA) and FCGR3B-NA1/NA2 (Fc gamma RIIIB), were not associated with outcome. There were also no significant survival differences among patient subgroups at increased risk of rejection-related injury, such as pre-sensitized recipients (> 0% panel reactivity; n = 438) or recipients treated for rejection within the first year after transplantation (n = 229). Our study results suggest that the earlier shown association of Fc gamma R polymorphism with microcirculation inflammation may not be strong enough to exert a meaningful effect on graft survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据