4.5 Article

Associations between handgrip strength and hypertension in relation to circulating CD34-positive cell levels among Japanese older men: a cross-sectional study

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s12199-021-00982-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17H03740, 18K06448]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K06448, 17H03740] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found a significant positive association between handgrip strength and hypertension in participants with high levels of CD34-positive cells, but not in those with low levels. This suggests that vascular homeostasis plays a role in maintaining muscle strength and its association with hypertension.
Background A positive association between handgrip strength and blood pressure has been reported. Since these factors are linked to the condition of the endothelium, the activity of endothelial repair might influence the association between handgrip strength and hypertension. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 257 Japanese men aged 60-69 years who underwent an annual health checkup. As individuals with high level of circulating CD34-positive cells might show active endothelial repair, which plays an important role in vascular homeostasis, participants were stratified by circulating CD34-positive cell levels, using the median value of this population (0.96 cells/mu L) as the cutoff. Results Independent of known cardiovascular risk factors, for participants with a high CD34-positive cell, handgrip strength is significantly positively associated with hypertension (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of hypertension for 1 standard deviation increment of handgrip strength were 1.85 (1.19, 2.88) but not for participants with a low CD34-positive cell (0.91 (0.61, 1.37)). Conclusion The positive association between handgrip strength and hypertension is limited to high CD34-positive cells. This result may help clarify the role of vascular homeostasis in maintaining muscle strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据