4.6 Article

Interactions of Ruddlesden-Popper Phases and Migration-Induced Field-Stabilized Polar Phase in Strontium Titanate

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst11060693

关键词

perovskites; transition metal oxides; defect structures; phase transition; MFP phase; RP phases; density functional theory

资金

  1. DFG [DFG 405595647, ZS 120/1-1, GE 1202/12-1, DFG 409743569]
  2. Helmholtz-Initiative and Networking funds [Ex Net-0028, W2/W3-026]
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-52-12029a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on validating the possible connection between the known Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) phases and the novel concept of migration-induced field-stabilized polar (MFP) phase. Analysis of model structures of RP phases in bulk strontium titanate using density functional theory (DFT) showed that RP phases generally favor MFP formation. Good agreement was found concerning atomic displacements and lattice strain, indicating the potential for RP phases to influence MFP formation.
This work focuses on the validation of a possible connection of the known Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) phases and the novel concept of the migration-induced field-stabilized polar (MFP) phase. To study this subject, model structures of RP phases in bulk strontium titanate are analyzed by means of density functional theory (DFT). The obtained geometries are compared to experimental MFP data. Good agreement can be found concerning atomic displacements in the pm range and lattice strain inferred by the RP phases. Looking at the energy point of view, the defect structures are on the convex hull of the Gibb's free energy. Although the dynamics to form the discussed defect models are not addressed in detail, the interplay and stability of the described defect model will add to the possible structure scenarios within the near-surface region of strontium titanate. As a result, it can be suggested that RP phases generally favor the MFP formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据