4.6 Article

Fracture Behavior of Single-Crystal Sapphire in Different Crystal Orientations

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst11080930

关键词

single crystal sapphire; fracture toughness; three-point bending test; single-edge V-notch beam; cleavage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51805176]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian [2019J01059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the anisotropy of fracture toughness and fracture mechanism of single-crystal sapphire, showing that different crystal planes exhibit varying fracture toughness and behavior, related to the loading surfaces. C-plane sapphire demonstrated the highest fracture toughness and fracture behavior consistent with theoretical analysis.
In order to study the anisotropy of fracture toughness and fracture mechanism of single-crystal sapphire, the three-point bending tests and the single-edge V-notch beam (SEVNB) were used to test the fracture toughness of A-plane, C-plane, and M-plane sapphire, which are widely used in the semiconductor, aerospace, and other high-tech fields. Fracture morphology was investigated by a scanning electron microscope and three-dimensional video microscopy. The fracture toughness and fracture morphology of different crystal planes of sapphire showed obvious anisotropy and were related to the loading surfaces. C-plane sapphire showed the maximal fracture toughness of 4.24 MPa center dot m(1/2), and fracture toughness decreases in the order of C-plane, M-plane, and A-plane. The surface roughness is related to the dissipation of fracture energy. The surface roughness of the fracture surface is in the same order as C-plane > M-plane > A-plane. The fracture behavior and morphology of experiments were consistent with the theoretical analysis. C-plane sapphire cleavages along the R-plane with an angle of 57.6 degrees and the rhombohedral twin were activated. M-plane and A-plane sapphire cleavages along their cross-section.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据