4.1 Article

First-in-Human Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Pirepemat, a Cortical Enhancer, in Healthy Volunteers

期刊

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 1485-1494

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.959

关键词

first-in-human; healthy volunteers; Parkinson disease; pharmacokinetics; pirepemat

资金

  1. Integrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB, Gothenburg, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cortical enhancer Pirepemat showed good tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties in a first-in-human study, supporting its further clinical development for the prevention of falls in Parkinson disease patients.
Pirepemat (IRL752) is a cortical enhancer being developed for the prevention of falls in patients with Parkinson disease. This first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 study evaluated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of pirepemat administered as oral single ascending doses (10, 35, 75, 175, 350 mg) and multiple ascending doses (100 and 250 mg 3 times daily) for 7 days to healthy male volunteers. Twenty and 24 subjects were randomly assigned in the single ascending dose and multiple ascending doses parts of the study, respectively. Pirepemat was generally well tolerated, although an increased frequency of adverse events of mild intensity within nervous system disorders (headache and dizziness) was seen after administration of 350 mg as a single dose and after multiple doses of 100 and 250 mg. PK of pirepemat showed a linear relationship over the dose range studied and exhibited dose proportionality after multiple-dose administration. Accumulation after 7 days of multiple dosing was minor. Absorption was rapid, with a median time to maximum concentration of 2.0 hours on day 1 and day 7 (100 and 250 mg) and a mean terminal half-life between 3.7 and 5.2 hours. Food intake had no (obvious) impact on PK. The results support 3-times-daily dosing and further clinical development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据