4.6 Article

Personalized Augmented Reality Based Tourism System: Big Data and User Demographic Contexts

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11136047

关键词

augmented reality; big data; tourism; decision tree; VIKOR; SWARA

资金

  1. MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) [IITP-2021-2016-0-00312]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research aims to design a personalized AR based on a tourist system that retrieves big data according to users' demographic contexts. By predicting the type of tourist attraction and extracting correct data for users, using decision-making methods, the research showed better performance of decision tree compared to SVM in predicting tourist attraction types.
A lack of required data resources is one of the challenges of accepting the Augmented Reality (AR) to provide the right services to the users, whereas the amount of spatial information produced by people is increasing daily. This research aims to design a personalized AR that is based on a tourist system that retrieves the big data according to the users' demographic contexts in order to enrich the AR data source in tourism. This research is conducted in two main steps. First, the type of the tourist attraction where the users interest is predicted according to the user demographic contexts, which include age, gender, and education level, by using a machine learning method. Second, the correct data for the user are extracted from the big data by considering time, distance, popularity, and the neighborhood of the tourist places, by using the VIKOR and SWAR decision making methods. By about 6%, the results show better performance of the decision tree by predicting the type of tourist attraction, when compared to the SVM method. In addition, the results of the user study of the system show the overall satisfaction of the participants in terms of the ease-of-use, which is about 55%, and in terms of the systems usefulness, about 56%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据