4.6 Article

Implementing Ethical, Legal, and Societal Considerations in Wearable Robot Design

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11156705

关键词

wearable robot; exoskeleton; ethical; legal; and societal issues; ELSI guidance; ELSI implementation; user-centred design; responsible research and innovation; value-sensitive design

资金

  1. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [16116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides practical guidance for the implementation of ethical, legal and societal implications in the design, development and use of wearable robots, aiming to help the community develop safer, more user-friendly devices that have a positive impact on society.
Ethical, legal and societal implications (ELSI) in the development of wearable robots (WRs) are currently not explicitly addressed in most guidelines for WR developers. Previous work has identified ELSI related to WRs, e.g., impacts on body and identity, ableism, data protection, control and responsibilities, but translation of these concerns into actionable recommendations remains outstanding. This paper provides practical guidance for the implementation of ELSI in WR design, development and use. First, we identify the need for domain-specific recommendations against the context of current ELSI guidance. We then demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of taking a domain-specific approach by successively transforming currently identified ELSI into an action-guiding flowchart for integration of ELSI specific to the different stages of WR development. This flowchart identifies specific questions to be considered by WR development teams and suggests actions to be taken in response. By tailoring ELSI guidance to WR developers, centring it on user needs, their relation to others and wider society, and being cognizant of existing legislation and values, we hope to help the community develop better WRs that are safer, have greater usability, and which impact positively on society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据