4.6 Article

Application of Emerging Cell Disintegration Techniques for the Accelerated Recovery of Curcuminoids from Curcuma longa

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11178238

关键词

curcuminoid extraction; pulsed electric field; ultrasound; enzyme; pretreatment; non-conventional extraction; Curcuma longa

资金

  1. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU) [ICM-2019-13805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different cell disintegration techniques have varying impacts on the recovery of curcuminoids, with EP showing good performance in fresh turmeric, and UP causing significant cell damage. PEF stands out for achieving high total curcuminoid recovery with low specific energy input.
Curcuminoids, the bioactive compounds with many beneficial effects on human health, exist in Curcuma longa (turmeric). In the present study, the impact of different cell disintegration techniques to enhance total curcuminoid recovery (TC) from fresh and dried turmeric was investigated. The impact of thermal pretreatment (TP), ultrasound pretreatment (UP), enzyme pretreatment (EP), and pulsed electric field pretreatment (PEF) on the recovery of curcumin (CUR), demethoxycurcumin (DMC), and bis-demethoxycurcumin (BDMC) from fresh and dried turmeric were studied. The cell disintegration index (Z(p)) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of curcuminoids were performed to evaluate the efficiency of the applied techniques. With fresh turmeric, the highest curcuminoid recovery was 83.6 mg/g dry basis with EP. The highest structural tissue damage was obtained with UP achieving a cell disintegration level of 92.5%. The technology with the highest time-saving and low specific energy input was PEF with a total curcuminoid recovery of 80.9 mg/g dry basis. Working with dried turmeric, the drying required high specific energy input for 72 h at 50 degrees C; however, the untreated dried sample reached 125.3 mg/g dry basis of TC without further pretreatment after drying.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据