4.6 Article

Energy Communities Design Optimization in the Italian Framework

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11115218

关键词

energy communities; energy resource optimization; renewable resources; MILP

资金

  1. Energynius-Energy networks integration for urban systems project [CUP E31F18001040007]
  2. Regione Emilia-Romagna through the European Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy communities are expected to play a key role in achieving European decarbonization goals, and the regulatory framework adopted by each Member State is crucial for managing these new customers. This paper provides an overview of EC regulation, focusing on Italian legislation, and proposes a novel methodology for designing and managing energy community initiatives. By optimizing design and operations and using a Shapley value-based approach, the methodology effectively ensures proper cash flow for the community and promotes energy-efficient behaviors among its members.
Energy communities (EC) are expected to have a pivotal role to reach European decarbonization targets. One of the key aspects is the regulatory framework adopted by each Member State to properly manage such new customers' aggregation. The paper firstly provides an updated overview of the EC regulation, focusing on the current Italian legislation. Next, a novel methodology for the design and management of energy community initiatives is proposed. The procedure firstly solves a design and operation optimization problem to calculate the best size of energy assets (boiler, heat pump, photovoltaic, thermal storage) to be installed. Second, a Shapley value-based approach is exploited to distribute a part of the community's incomes to members, based on their contribution to the overall welfare. Results demonstrate that the adopted methodology is effective in ensuring a proper cash flow for the community, while pushing its members towards energy efficient behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据