4.6 Article

Size Effect on the Acoustic Emission Behavior of Textile-Reinforced Cement Composites

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11125425

关键词

waveform; bending; textile-reinforced cement; frequency; rise time; propagation distance; matrix crack

资金

  1. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (FWO) [G.0337.19N, 12J7720N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acoustic emission (AE) is used for structural health assessment of materials, with potential applications in cementitious composites and polymers. However, factors such as wave propagation distance, plate geometry, heterogeneity, and reflections can lead to attenuation and distortion of AE waveforms, making interpretation more complex. This study investigates the effect of wave propagation on plain glass textile-reinforced cement (TRC) plates and evaluates how plate dimensions and propagation distance impact AE characteristics.
Acoustic emission (AE) is applied for the structural health evaluation of materials. It commonly uses piezoelectric sensors to detect elastic waves coming from energy releases within the material. Concerning cementitious composites as well as polymers, AE parameters have proven their potential to not only detect the existence of a defect, its location and the fracture mode, but also the developing strain field even before visible damage evolves. However, the wave propagation distance, wave dispersion due to plate geometry, heterogeneity and reflections result in attenuation and distortion of the AE waveforms. These factors render the interpretation more complex, especially for large samples. In this study, the effect of wave propagation on plain glass textile-reinforced cement (TRC) plates is investigated. Then, curved plates with different widths are mechanically loaded for bending with concurrent AE monitoring. The aim is to evaluate to what extent the plate dimensions and propagation distance influence the original AE characteristics corresponding to a certain fracture mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据