4.6 Review

How Can Existing Buildings with Historic Values Contribute to Achieving Emission Reduction Ambitions?

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11135978

关键词

embodied emission; existing building; LCA; heritage value; socio-cultural value

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway within the ADAPT project [294584]
  2. Norwegian Directorate for Cultural Heritage in the project CLIMAP-X

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Refurbishment and adaptive reuse of existing buildings can help Norway achieve a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, while preserving cultural heritage values and saving resources.
In line with the Paris Agreement, Norway aims for an up to 55% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels and to be a low-emission society by 2050. Given that 85-90% of today's buildings are expected to still be in use in 2050, refurbishment and adaptive reuse of existing buildings can help in achieving the environmental goals. The aim of this work is to provide a holistic picture of refurbishment and adaptive reuse of existing buildings, including buildings with heritage values, seen from a life cycle perspective. The methods applied are a literature review of LCA studies and experiences from quantitative case study analysis of selected Norwegian case studies. The findings show that extending the service life of existing buildings by refurbishment and adaptive reuse has significant possibilities in reducing GHG emissions, keeping cultural heritage values, and saving scarce raw material resources. The findings show limited LCA studies, uncertainties in existing LCA studies due to variations in case-specific refurbishment or intervention measures, and a lack of transparent and harmonized background data and methodological choices. In conclusion, performing a holistic study covering the whole LCA and including socio-cultural values and economic aspects will enable supporting an argument to assert the sustainability of existing buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据