4.6 Article

3D FEA of Infilled RC Framed Structures Protected by Seismic Joints and FRP Jackets

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11146403

关键词

RC frames; brick infills; prior damage; finite element analyses; seismic joint; FRP

资金

  1. European Union [MIS 5050146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on characteristic cases of recently tested real-scale RC framed wall infilled structures with innovative seismic protection through polyurethane joints or polyurethane-impregnated fiber grids, revealing suitable FE models and the unique features of interventions.
This study focused on characteristic cases of recently tested real-scale RC framed wall infilled structures with innovative seismic protection through polyurethane joints (PUFJ) or polyurethane-impregnated fiber grids (FRPU). The frames revealed a highly ductile response while preventing infill collapse. Herein, suitable 3D pseudo-dynamic FE models were developed in order to reproduce the experimental results. The advanced Explicit Dynamics framework may help reveal the unique features of the considered interventions. Externally applied double-sided FRPU jackets on OrthoBlock infills may maintain an adequate bond with the surrounding RC frame as well as with the brick infill substrate at up to a 3.6% drift. In a weak four-column RC structure, the OrthoBlock infills with PUFJ seismic joints may increase the initial stiffness remarkably, increase the base shear by three times (compared with the bare structure) and maintain a high horizontal drift of 3.7%. After this phase, the structure may receive FRPU retrofitting, reveal the redistribution of stress over broad infill regions, including predamaged parts, and still develop a higher initial stiffness and base shear (compared with the bare RC). The realization of a desirable ductile behavior of infilled frames through PUFJ of only 20 mm thickness, as well as through FRPU jacketing, may remarkably broaden the alternatives in seismic protection against the collapse of structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据