4.6 Article

In Memory Energy Application for Resistive Random Access Memory

期刊

ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202100297

关键词

dual behavior; energy in memory; RRAM battery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study delves into the innovative idea of a hybrid dual-behavior device based on emerging nonvolatile memory technology, aiming to achieve data retention and energy storage. Evaluation of electrochemical characteristics on RRAM shows potential energy storage capability and proposes design concepts for various emerging and standard applications.
This work explores the innovative concept of a hybrid dual-behavior device, based on emerging nonvolatile memory technology, for both data retention and energy storage. RRAM (resistive random access memory) is considered a major candidate as next-generation memory, thanks to its promising performances in terms of scalability and CMOS process compatibility. Its working mechanisms, based on faradaic processes, motivate the study on the feasibility of operating RRAM also as energy storage element. To evaluate the energy capability, various electrochemical characterizations on state-of-the-art RRAM are presented. The highly resistive electrolyte, extremely small physical scale (nm), and current range (pA), put in quite a critical framework, far from conventional solid-state batteries. Cyclic voltammetry tests reveal that although no oxidation peak appears during the redox cycle, the cells behave as standard electrochemical storage elements when investigating the impact of the scan rate, maximum positive voltage, and area on the reduction peak. Concentration and diffusion coefficients are derived, in the order of 10(-12) cm(2) s(-1) and few mmol cm(-3), respectively, while energy storage capability amounts to 3.5 pJ mu m(-2). Finally, design concepts are proposed, where RRAM in-memory energy technology would be a newfangled approach to meet the needs of various emerging and standard applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据