4.6 Article

Suppression of Hot-Carrier Effects Facilitated by the Multimodal Thin-Film Transistor Architecture

期刊

ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202100533

关键词

hot-carrier effects; Schottky barriers; thin-film transistors

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/R511791/1, EP/R028559/1, EP/V002759/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/R028559/1, EP/V002759/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that contact-controlled devices exhibit robust performance under extreme biasing conditions, while the multimodal transistor (MMT) provides further control by independently regulating current flow and magnitude. Through technology computer-aided design simulations, the internal electric field distributions are studied and operational guidelines are formulated for optimal characteristics of the MMT. These universal principles should inform device design and operation in all high carrier mobility material systems.
Hot-carrier effects are a persistent challenge for Ohmic contact, high carrier mobility thin-film transistors. As semiconductor properties are systematically improved, such phenomena (e.g., the kink effect) are becoming apparent even in materials such as InGaZnO. Few of the past solutions are practical in these low-complexity semiconductor systems. Here, it is shown that contact-controlled devices offer robust performance under extreme biasing conditions due to their distinctive charge injection processes. The recently-developed multimodal transistor (MMT) provides further control still, by separate regulation of current flow and magnitude. Internal electric field distributions in the source and drain regions are studied via technology computer-aided design simulations, and support the formulation of operational guidelines for the MMT's channel control gate for optimal characteristics in saturation. As MMT principles are universal, these findings should inform device design and operation in all high carrier mobility material systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据