4.4 Article

Removal of Phenolic Compounds from Olive Mill Wastewater by Microalgae Grown Under Dark and Light Conditions

期刊

WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 525-534

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-021-01536-5

关键词

Microalgae; Removal; Olive mill wastewater; Phenolic compounds

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. ERA-Net Cofound Action [031B0607A]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [031B0607A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the biotic removal of phenolic compounds in olive mill wastewater using three microalgae species. Results showed that a certain concentration of OMW can enhance microbial growth, and removal of phenolic compounds is favored under light conditions.
Phenolic compounds in olive mill wastewater (OMW) are considered an environmental threat due to their antimicrobial properties. Because of the metabolic versatility of microalgae, a biotic removal of these compounds seems a suitable approach. To investigate the biotic removal of phenolic compounds, the three microalgae species Chlorella vulgaris, Acutodesmus obliquus and Monoraphidium braunii were cultivated in flasks under constant light (50 mu mol/m(2)s) and dark (1 g/L glucose) conditions in presence of different concentrations of OMW. Addition of 1% (v/v) OMW to the culture medium was shown to be non-inhibitory or even growth enhancing, and phenolic compounds were removed by 7-21% by all tested species. Cultivations with 6% (v/v) OMW resulted in a few exceptional experiments in fast growth (C. vulgaris under light, M. braunii under dark conditions) and removal of phenolic compounds (M. braunii, dark). Higher percentages (12 and 25%, v/v) of OMW were inhibitory. Under dark conditions microalgae first consumed glucose and removed phenolic compounds in a diauxic process. Removal of phenolic compounds was favoured under light conditions. Results of this study reveal the opportunities and the challenges of a microalgae-based removal of phenolic compounds and valorization of toxic OMW. Graphic abstract

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据